Drift metrics
In force on first publication of figures. Last reviewed 2026-08-18. First figures due 2026-09-30.
1. What this is for
The documents in this pack make claims about how Saberra is structured. A claim that cannot be falsified is a marketing statement. These 12 metrics turn each structural claim into a number that either confirms or contradicts it.
Three metrics currently read as badly as possible: one person holds 100% of authority, four of four critical roles have no backup, and the treasury has one signer. These are published because hiding them would contradict the claim that this pack is honest.
The metrics improve when the company changes. Publishing bad numbers is how the obligation to change them stays visible.
2. The metrics
Published quarterly. First set due 2026-09-30, covering the period ending that date. Where a metric is not yet measurable, the reason is published instead of the number.
| # | Metric | Threshold | Current |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | % of operating authority held by one person | Triggers review at 100% | 100% (review pending) |
| 2 | % of revenue from largest single customer | Triggers review at 25% | — |
| 3 | % of revenue from largest single funding source | Triggers review at 25% | — |
| 4 | # of critical roles with no documented backup | Triggers review at 4 | 4 of 4 |
| 5 | # of governance requests refused by Steward (quarter) | Disclose any refusal | Not yet in force |
| 6 | # of conflict matters opened (quarter) | Disclose all | 0 |
| 7 | # of conflict matters open past 60 days | Disclose any | 0 |
| 8 | Days since continuity plan was last tested | Annual test required | Never tested |
| 9 | # of treasury signers | Second signer required at 3-month reserve | 1 |
| 10 | # of related-party transactions (quarter) | Disclose each | 0 |
| 11 | Days since Regen Pool policy was last reviewed | Annual review required | 0 (in force 2026-08-18) |
| 12 | # of review requests received from customers / partners (quarter) | Respond to each within 30 days | 0 |
3. Publication format
Figures appear on this page, updated within five days of each quarter end, with the quarter's SHA-256 hash of the published figures. Each quarterly publication is committed to the public governance repository so the history of figures is public and so changes appear as changes rather than as though the text always read the current values.
4. Integrity mechanism
The first check is structural: published via a public git repository means amendment history is public. A metric that quietly moves between quarters produces a visible diff.
The second check is the Steward's publication right: the Steward may independently publish any metric or any refusal without the founder's consent. A single-person check over their own figures is not meaningful; the Steward's independent right is the compensating control.
The third check is customer confirmation: any customer may ask whether their account is counted correctly in metrics 2 and 6. Saberra must respond within 14 days.
5. What triggers a structural review
Any metric crossing its threshold under section 2 triggers a structural review under document 05. That review is limited to the documents the metric concerns. The metric itself is not erased or recapped; it is updated in the next quarterly publication with what changed.
6. What this does not fix
These metrics are self-reported. The founder compiles and publishes them without independent audit. The Steward's right to publish independently and the customer's right to request confirmation are partial compensating controls, not a full audit function.
A determined founder who wanted to misreport these numbers could do so. The publishing mechanism is designed to make misreporting visible over time, not to make it impossible.